𐌰 | 𐌱 | 𐌲 | 𐌳 | 𐌴 | 𐌵 | 𐌶 | 𐌷 | 𐌸 | 𐌹 | 𐌺 | 𐌻 | 𐌼 | 𐌽 | 𐌾 | 𐌿 |
𐍀 | 𐍁 | 𐍂 | 𐍃 | 𐍄 | 𐍅 | 𐍆 | 𐍇 | 𐍈 | 𐍉 | 𐍊 |
So the style isn't quite like Times. But...Gothic died out in the early 1700s, was it ever printed? What examples do we have of it, besides the hand-printed bibles?
This is a general question about writing systems that have no printing history. Should one force a style on them to make them like a Latin style? That would be artificial, at least. Maybe it's better to go from a good handrwiting sample (of similar weight and adonment).
Here is some Gothic:
𐌰𐍄𐍄𐌰
𐌿𐌽𐍃𐌰𐍂 𐌸𐌿 𐌹𐌽
𐌷𐌹𐌼𐌹𐌽𐌿𐌽
For the whole Wulfia bible in script see Gothic Bible in Ulfilan Gothic Script
Some other nice fonts are listed here: http://got.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Gothic_Unicode_Fonts
Unicode 5 Book explains diacritics, numerals, etc. http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode5.0.0/ch14.pdf
Sample picture of Gothic text http://www.omniglot.com/writing/gothic.htm
Codex Argenteus at Uppsala Universitet
Gothic Online lessons at U. Texas
Translation: The Codex Argenteus Online
Glyphs in FreeSerif taken from George Duros' Analecta font. Based on Wulfia's handwriting. ISO-8859-1 text http://www.wulfila.be/
Scaled to be of similar size, weight as Serif.