The following functions relate to input/output (I/O). Optional parameters are enclosed in square brackets ([ ]):
close(
filename [,
how])
¶Close the file filename for input or output. Alternatively, the argument may be a shell command that was used for creating a coprocess, or for redirecting to or from a pipe; then the coprocess or pipe is closed. See Closing Input and Output Redirections for more information.
When closing a coprocess, it is occasionally useful to first close
one end of the two-way pipe and then to close the other. This is done
by providing a second argument to close()
. This second argument
(how)
should be one of the two string values "to"
or "from"
,
indicating which end of the pipe to close. Case in the string does
not matter.
See Two-Way Communications with Another Process,
which discusses this feature in more detail and gives an example.
Note that the second argument to close()
is a gawk
extension; it is not available in compatibility mode (see Command-Line Options).
fflush(
[filename])
¶Flush any buffered output associated with filename, which is either a file opened for writing or a shell command for redirecting output to a pipe or coprocess.
Many utility programs buffer their output (i.e., they save information
to write to a disk file or the screen in memory until there is enough
for it to be worthwhile to send the data to the output device).
This is often more efficient than writing
every little bit of information as soon as it is ready. However, sometimes
it is necessary to force a program to flush its buffers (i.e.,
write the information to its destination, even if a buffer is not full).
This is the purpose of the fflush()
function—gawk
also
buffers its output, and the fflush()
function forces
gawk
to flush its buffers.
Brian Kernighan added fflush()
to his awk
in April
1992. For two decades, it was a common extension. In December
2012, it was accepted for inclusion into the POSIX standard.
See the Austin Group website.
POSIX standardizes fflush()
as follows: if there
is no argument, or if the argument is the null string (""
),
then awk
flushes the buffers for all open output files
and pipes.
NOTE: Prior to version 4.0.2,
gawk
would flush only the standard output if there was no argument, and flush all output files and pipes if the argument was the null string. This was changed in order to be compatible with BWKawk
, in the hope that standardizing this feature in POSIX would then be easier (which indeed proved to be the case).With
gawk
, you can use ‘fflush("/dev/stdout")’ if you wish to flush only the standard output.
fflush()
returns zero if the buffer is successfully flushed;
otherwise, it returns a nonzero value. (gawk
returns −1.)
In the case where all buffers are flushed, the return value is zero
only if all buffers were flushed successfully. Otherwise, it is
−1, and gawk
warns about the problem filename.
gawk
also issues a warning message if you attempt to flush
a file or pipe that was opened for reading (such as with getline
),
or if filename is not an open file, pipe, or coprocess.
In such a case, fflush()
returns −1, as well.
Interactive Versus Noninteractive Buffering |
---|
As a side point, buffering issues can be even more confusing if your program is interactive (i.e., communicating with a user sitting at a keyboard).54 Interactive programs generally line buffer their output (i.e., they write out every line). Noninteractive programs wait until they have a full buffer, which may be many lines of output. Here is an example of the difference: $ awk '{ print $1 + $2 }' 1 1 -| 2 2 3 -| 5 Ctrl-d Each line of output is printed immediately. Compare that behavior with this example: $ awk '{ print $1 + $2 }' | cat 1 1 2 3 Ctrl-d -| 2 -| 5 Here, no output is printed until after the Ctrl-d is typed, because
it is all buffered and sent down the pipe to |
system(command)
¶Execute the operating system
command command and then return to the awk
program.
Return command’s exit status (see further on).
For example, if the following fragment of code is put in your awk
program:
END { system("date | mail -s 'awk run done' root") }
the system administrator is sent mail when the awk
program
finishes processing input and begins its end-of-input processing.
Note that redirecting print
or printf
into a pipe is often
enough to accomplish your task. If you need to run many commands, it
is more efficient to simply print them down a pipeline to the shell:
while (more stuff to do) print command | "/bin/sh" close("/bin/sh")
However, if your awk
program is interactive, system()
is useful for running large
self-contained programs, such as a shell or an editor.
Some operating systems cannot implement the system()
function.
system()
causes a fatal error if it is not supported.
NOTE: When --sandbox is specified, the
system()
function is disabled (see Command-Line Options).
On POSIX systems, a command’s exit status is a 16-bit number. The exit
value passed to the C exit()
function is held in the high-order
eight bits. The low-order bits indicate if the process was killed by a
signal (bit 7) and if so, the guilty signal number (bits 0–6).
Traditionally, awk
’s system()
function has simply
returned the exit status value divided by 256. In the normal case this
gives the exit status but in the case of death-by-signal it yields
a fractional floating-point value.55 POSIX states that awk
’s
system()
should return the full 16-bit value.
gawk
steers a middle ground.
The return values are summarized in Table 9.5.
Situation | Return value from system() |
---|---|
--traditional | C system() ’s value divided by 256 |
--posix | C system() ’s value |
Normal exit of command | Command’s exit status |
Death by signal of command | 256 + number of murderous signal |
Death by signal of command with core dump | 512 + number of murderous signal |
Some kind of error | −1 |
As of August, 2018, BWK awk
now follows gawk
’s behavior
for the return value of system()
.
A program is interactive if the standard output is connected to a terminal device. On modern systems, this means your keyboard and screen.
In private correspondence, Dr. Kernighan has indicated to me that the way this was done was probably a mistake.